Your current location：home > News > News Details
China Gas Information
In may this year, Beijing changping district with the garden district 9 floor 9 layer a resident house exploded, household ms. Li died. News things outstanding, because the blast was confirmed as the cause of ms. Li use gas undeserved, property management company and to ms. Li's parents punish because of the explosion of the damage caused by the public facilities and more than 1.73 million yuan. October 24, morning, changping district court hearing the case.
After the incident, according to media reports, in building no. 9 and separated by more than 60 meters 11 downstairs, ground was broken glass fragments, several have deformation of window of model steel window frame fell on the lawn, next to the trunk of a tree, still can see these impact trace. Residents say is window frame analysis on deflagration of the shock wave fly out of more than 60 meters, hit tree and fell on the ground. And according to the property management company to submit proof of the explosion cause elevator damage, facade and building structure are need to repair and reinforcement.
Responsible for the community service work with property management company in the prosecution said, in May this year 20 bums accident taken not only li life, and lead to ms. Li home place unit building public place and public facilities severely damaged. After the accident, property company actively cooperate with the government department dealing with large Numbers of rehabilitation work, and actively to the damaged public areas and facilities for the maintenance and replacement, spent more than 1.73 million yuan. Property management company think, because ms. Li the improper use of natural gas lead to combustion accident, caused by the public areas and facilities for the maintenance and replacement do not belong to the property management company normal service scope, the resulting expenses shall be made by the ms. Li take full responsibility for compensation. But because ms. Li was killed, ms. Li's parents as its first order heir, the above shall be liable for any loss. Property management company sued for ms. Li's parents pay compensation for the losses of more than 1.73 million yuan, if ms. Li's parents give up inheritance, the request the court to dispose of the ms. Li heritage in compensation for the loss.
The reporter understands, property management company has applied to freeze the ms. Li's heritage, but this is the ownership of the heritage remains controersial. Ms. Li parents' agent said, ms. Li and not married, their parents love have to add to his daughter. Although the house registration in ms. Li name, but her name property there are many are their parents, her property is with the parents' common property.
For explosion the cause of the accident, the two sides controversial. Property management company submitted a fire accident protocols that accident is ms. Li in the room caused by the improper use of gas. And LiFu agent argues that, accident protocols confirm hearth and gas interface all belong to open state, it is to belong to use state, according to the scene of the accident trace look, is in the fire explosion, conclusion is the user to use natural gas caused by improper. But, the user how to use undeserved, accident but book shall be avoided. Since 2003, our country for gas use has a regulation, gas flame-out after blocking device, so the user how to improper operation, must have further proved. There is no proof, can't take responsibility completely push to the dead.
In addition to who be to blame, but both sides to the loss caused by explosion have a disagreement. Property management company submit the contract and invoice, prove its paid elevator payment for goods and installation), change the motor, the building public facilities for the maintenance and reinforcement. Property management company agent said that after the accident, 9th floor household door deformation, the window Fried fly, corridor were soot, elevator serious deformation, 6 layer above the glass curtain wall all chipped. Property management company said the claim for compensation of 1.73 million yuan and not all loss, just have to pay the cost. For the follow-up maintenance costs, the company reserves the right to recourse.
And ms. Li parents' agent are of the opinion that the damaged public facilities have residual value, it is to need maintenance or need a thorough change, all need appraisal institution to identification. Due to the property management company does not provide the judiciary damage to property appraisal, so can't verify loss. The agent think, according to the property management company and other companies signed purchase and construction agreement to prove loss, is not legitimacy.
The court to ms. Li heritage ownership as well as to the accident responsibility and how to determine the amount of loss, it is the key to the trial.
Changping district court 24 days, did not make a judgment on this case, the media will continue to focus on the case trial